ALPINE, UT | 17 March 2008 | I remember as a kid being told about the “Great Depression” and how the banks had collapsed and the government had to come in and bail everyone out. I remember hearing about how FDR had saved America, etc. I had no idea then, how tainted my perspective was based upon the politicizing that had gone on for generations about what had actually happened. Similarly, I’m not sure how many Americans are paying attention today to what is actually happening right before their eyes. For certainly what is happening today will be the source of stories told to children for generations. 2008 is likely the year for the economic earthquake so oft predicted by economic thinkers for the last decade. I’m not kidding, exaggerating, nor do I think I’m a “doomsday-er.” But, one thing I also am not is a pretender, and people who are pretending that this is just a “tough spot” and that “America will work through this” are downplaying the realities of the present situation. The effect that this pretending is having on average citizens is that they stay asleep. It’s time my friends, to wake up and prepare. Actually, it’s past time for some of the most important preparation but it’s not too late for those who are anxious, willing, and committed to getting their house in order - quickly.In order to grasp what’s “really” going on, one needs to simply pay attention to the financial news. Take for example the news story about J.P. Morgan and Bear Stearns.
Overview:
Bear Stearns is one of the largest global investment banks and securities trading firms in the world. Its primary clients are corporations, institutions, governments and high net worth individuals. Between 2005 and 2007 the firm was widely recognized as one of the “Most Admired” firms in Fortune magazine’s “America’s Most Admired Companies” survey.
While anyone can read the headlines, most average folks just have no idea how this company might affect them personally. One of the major investments of Bear Stearns has been mortgage backed securities. Or in other words, when you get a mortgage from a normal bank - they probably sell that mortgage to someone with more money than they have. The “asset” that they are selling is your promise to pay. Your promise is collateralized by the value of your home. Bear Stearns was highly invested in this section of the market. This means that many governments and corporations had substantial portions of their portfolio depending upon the performance of Bear Stearn’s investment in this area. With the real estate crisis, the mortgage/credit crisis, and the collapse of the sub-prime mortgage industry Bear Stearns was unable to maintain a substantial degree of liquidity of its investments. To make it more simple, they would put money in, but could not get money out of their investments. This means that they can’t pay their bills, can’t pay investors, etc. It basically means they can’t operate. Now, I’m not exaggerating. On March 10, 2008 the company denied it had cash liquidity problems, but on March 14, 2008 the AP reported that JP Morgan Chase, in conjunction with the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, would provide temporary funding because “its liquidity significantly deteriorated over the past day.” So, in a nut shell, the company has no cash but has huge obligations to major corporations and governments across the globe. If the company were to just close its doors besides the catastrophic loss to its investors the affect would ripple across the industry causing other investors in similar companies to want to pull out (a.k.a. “run on the bank”) because of fears similar things may happen to them. So, the Federal Reserve steps in and provides the cash needed to run the business for 28 days. But, the situation is even worse. 28 days from now is about April 11th. Look for more shocking developments in the financial sector as this loan comes due.
Now, let’s look at a few main points in the article.
Key Points:
“Government regulators, including Federal Reserve and the Office of he Comptroller of the Currency, having given their blessing to the transaction.”
“Still, unwinding Bear Stearns could be a nightmare because of the plethora of Wall Street firms with which it has dealings.”
“Meanwhile, worries are deepening that other securities firms and commercial banks might be on shaky ground. Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. Chief Executive Richard Fuld, concerned about the markets and possible fallout from Bear Stearn’s troubles, cut short a trip to India and returned home Sunday, ahead of schedule, according to people familiar with the matter. The decision came after a series of calls Saturday to both senior executives at the firm and Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson, these people say. Investors’ concerns that the flight of worried Bear Stearns customers last week might spread to other firms is likely to make for a tense opening today on Wall Street. Yesterday, Mr. Paulson said in a TV interview that the government “would do what it takes” to protect the integrity of the financial system. On several occasions over the weekend, Mr. Paulson spoke about the Bear Stearns negotiations with Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke and New York Federal Reserve Bank President Timothy Geithner, according to people familiar with the matter.”
“One of Bear’s biggest attractions for J.P. Morgan is its prime brokerage business which caters to hedge fund clients. J.P. Morgan doesn’t have such a business and executives there have long said that they would like to add those operations to the bank’s portfolio…Over time, Bear Stearns’s misfortune could bear fruit for J.P. Morgan. Bear Stearns’s investment-banking unit, which underwrites stocks and bonds and advises on mergers, and its fixed-income and capital-markets trading businesses have been badly bruised by the credit crunch but still have some value.”
Action Steps:
Reference(s):
Date: Monday March 17, 2008
Source: Wall Street Journal - “J.P. Morgan rescue Bear Stearns”
Author: Dennis K. Berman, Susanne Craig and Kate Kelly
MRFC Principles:
(2, 4, 7, 9, 10)
RSS feed for comments on this post.
You must be logged in to post a comment.
March 17th, 2008 at 7:00 pm
Rick wrote:
[On March 10, 2008 the company denied it had cash liquidity problems, but on March 14, 2008 the AP reported that JP Morgan Chase, in conjunction with the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, would provide temporary funding because “its liquidity significantly deteriorated over the past day.”]
Bear Stearns deteriorated rapidly due to hedge funds pulling their huge cash balances from them. I read one report where the hedge funds were concerned about some other banks and would pull their balances there as well. Lehman Brothers is the one most identified.
The speed that we can move capital around can be an advantage creating major efficiencies and less drag on transaction costs. However, like leverage, it’s a double-edged sword. Bear Stearns’ case demonstrates that. Their problems are, of course, results from accumulated decisions over a period of time due to the huge exposure to risk taken through their own hedge funds investing in the sub-prime CDO’s (Collateralized Debt Obligations).
One word about the concentration of wealth in the hedge funds (well, more than one word):
Their impact on market segments is as visible as the impact that the Baby Boomers have had on the markets they’ve touched from Gerber baby food to Rock & Roll to muscle cars to personal computers to . . . you get the point.
I’ve watched the momentum shift from sector to sector. It almost becomes a pump and dump operation, but on a large scale. They helped fuel the securitization of the mortgage markets. When they saw that the run was over they quit buying and began selling. The market did seize up before they could get out completely, so they will register losses from it. They’ve moved into commodities and have created exponential price displacements of value to unsustainable heights. When they decide that they’ve reached a breaking point, they will start selling them off. They’ve become a force in the markets due to the concentration of the wealth they control. I’m not ascribing evil intentions to them, although there could be. It’s a component of the law of diminishing returns at work. The larger a fund becomes the more difficult it is to find markets large enough to keep producing the high returns that attracted the funds initially. Thus, they become like roving packs of predators keen on finding and producing the next bubble sector.
The bottom line to all these economic problems is a reflection of society. We can blame one entity or another, private or public, foreign or domestic, but it’s society that’s allowed it. Since it’s become “morally bankrupt,” it will find itself “financially bankrupt,” maybe sooner than later. That is why returning to core values based upon principles will be the one of the saving graces for society.
Denny
March 17th, 2008 at 10:18 pm
Not to change the subject, but the same type of Statist mythology that you (and everyone else) grew up with surrounding the Great Depression, and FDR’s supposed salvific actions in regard thereto, is precisely the same type of Statist mythology that sprang up following the North’s victory in the “Civil War”. The victors do indeed write the histories, don’t they?
March 17th, 2008 at 10:54 pm
Just read a related article that demonstrates the brain-off response to crises like these:
http://www.portfolio.com/news-markets/top-5/2008/03/10/Mortgage-Crisis-Investigation
“The drive for profits caused the industry to ignore or hide profound dangers, and led regulators to look the other way, while the full consequences weren’t anticipated as the crisis began.
In one respect, though, this disaster differs from every other big financial crisis, at least as far back as the 1929 market crash: No one is calling for an independent, blue-ribbon commission to investigate the causes, and to recommend ways to prevent such meltdowns from happening again.”
The idea that somehow all this could be avoided by a “blue-ribbon” panel of “experts” makes me sick - but it’s typical of the mentality that thinks that without the managing hand of the government, free market enterprise will ruin everything. Obviously, where fraud has been committed, there should be prosecution - but who is best suited to do so? A panel of “independent” pundits? Or those who have a personal stake and have been defrauded? Since when has anything been solved by a government panel faster and more effectively than free individuals seeking their own self-interest?